Proposition 141Constitutional amendment · Put on the ballot by lawmakers
Ban per-mile driving taxes
Explain it like I'm 5
This would stop Arizona governments from charging you based on how many miles you drive. It would also stop most government tracking or limits on your driving without permission.
Yes vote
State and local governments could not impose most taxes or fees based on miles driven, or monitor or limit vehicle miles without consent.
No vote
Governments would retain the ability to consider mileage-based taxes, fees, monitoring, or limits under future laws.
The question to ask yourself
Should Arizona permanently reject per-mile charges and tracking, even if future road-funding needs change?
The case for
- Protects drivers from government tracking of everyday travel.
- Blocks a possible new charge as electric vehicles reduce gas-tax revenue.
- Preserves privacy and makes road-tax rules more predictable.
Backed by: No organized campaign found
The case against
- Removes a possible future source of road funding.
- Could limit tools for reducing congestion or pollution.
- A constitutional ban would be difficult to change if transportation needs shift.
Opposed by: No organized opposition found
- Money
- No direct cost is stated; the measure would prohibit future mileage-based taxes or fees.
- Don't be misled
- It would not eliminate gas taxes, registration fees, or all vehicle taxes; it targets charges based on miles traveled.