Washington ballot measures 2026, explained

3 statewide measures on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Each one in plain words: what it does, what a yes and a no vote mean, and the best case on both sides. No recommendations.

Researched separately by
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiGrok
then checked against each other: partial agreement (78/100). See where they split. Updated November 3.

Your Washington ballot, in order. Tap a measure for the full explainer.

  1. Initiative 1State law

    Restore 2024 parental rights

    This would bring back the 2024 rules giving parents more access to school materials and notices about their children. It is like returning to an older school rulebook after lawmakers changed it.

    Yes vote
    Re-enacting Initiative 2081 and repealing later legislative changes.
    No vote
    Keeping the parental-rights law as amended by the Legislature in 2025.
    Case for and against, money, sources
  2. Initiative 638State law

    Require sex-based girls' sports rules

    This would restrict girls' sports to students the measure defines as biologically female. A health care provider would verify eligibility.

    Yes vote
    Schools and covered nonprofit athletic groups must bar biologically male students from female-only competitions and require provider verification.
    No vote
    Current Washington athletics policies remain in place.
    Case for and against, money, sources
  3. Initiative 645State law

    Repeal millionaires tax, ban income taxes

    This would cancel a planned tax on the part of a person's income above $1 million. It would also stop Washington state and local governments from creating personal income taxes, like locking a door against that kind of tax later.

    Yes vote
    Repealing the 9.9% tax on individual income above $1 million and prohibiting state and local individual income taxes.
    No vote
    Keeping the high-income tax and allowing future state or local income taxes if otherwise authorized.
    Case for and against, money, sources

How sure is this guide?

Where the four AIs disagreed

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok each researched Washington's ballot on their own, with web search. The score is how closely their answers matched. Where they split, check the official voter guide before you trust either side.

78/ 100Partial agreement

  • Initiative 645 revenue effect

    • GPT-5.6 Terra: Reversal reduces revenue by $11.4 billion over fiscal years 2027-2031.
    • Claude Sonnet 5.5: Reversal costs an estimated $11.4 billion over fiscal years 2027-2031.
    • Gemini 3.8 Flash: Reversal reduces revenue by $3.5 billion or more annually starting in 2029.
    • Grok 4.5: Reversal reduces revenue by $11.4 billion over fiscal years 2027-2031.
  • Initiative 1 fiscal impact

    • GPT-5.6 Terra: No statewide dollar estimate provided.
    • Claude Sonnet 5.5: No dollar figure found.
    • Gemini 3.8 Flash: Direct state and local costs not officially estimated.
    • Grok 4.5: No state fiscal impact; minor, indeterminate local costs.

Before you vote

This guide was written by AI models with web search and does not tell you how to vote. Details can be wrong: your sample ballot and Washington's official voter guide are the final word.

Look up your sample ballotFind your polling place

Still have a question?

A local measure, or what this ballot means for your taxes or job? See where four AIs agree.

Free account: 3 questions, no card. Your question will be waiting in the chat.