Question 2Constitutional amendment · Put on the ballot by lawmakers
Temporary Judicial Commission Members
Explain it like I'm 5
A state group reviews complaints about judges. This would let it use a qualified temporary substitute when a member cannot serve, like a substitute teacher keeping class going.
Yes vote
The commission chair may recall a former member, or request a temporary gubernatorial appointment or term extension, to fill certain vacancies or absences.
No vote
Current commission membership rules remain unchanged and temporary substitutes are not available under this amendment.
The question to ask yourself
Is keeping the commission operating worth allowing temporary appointments outside the ordinary process?
The case for
- Could prevent delays when members are recused or vacancies interrupt the commission's work.
- Uses people who must meet constitutional eligibility rules.
- Addresses procedure without changing the standards for disciplining judges.
Backed by: Maryland State Bar Association, Judge Anne Korbel Albright
The case against
- Expands temporary appointment power for the chair and governor.
- A temporary member could serve without the usual permanent appointment process.
- The amendment could reduce turnover or public oversight if temporary service lasts longer than expected.
Opposed by: No organized opposition found
- Money
- No direct tax effect or cost estimate is stated in the sources provided.
- Don't be misled
- This does not change the grounds for disciplining judges; it changes who may temporarily participate when a seat is unavailable.