Due diligence failures are catastrophically expensive
- A single analytical framework will systematically miss certain categories of risk
- AI models trained on success stories underweight failure modes and edge cases
- Due diligence requires both quantitative analysis and qualitative judgment calls
- The risks that kill deals are usually the ones nobody thought to check
How Synero works
1Ask your question
Your question goes to GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok. Each answers on its own.
2Get one answer
Synero writes one combined answer from the best of all four.
3See where they split
Agreement is a good sign. Disagreement tells you what to check.
Example question
“We're evaluating an acquisition of a 50-person B2B SaaS company. Revenue is $4M ARR growing 60% YoY, but customer concentration is high: top 3 customers are 45% of revenue. What risks should we investigate?”
Where models agree
- All models flag customer concentration as the primary risk requiring contractual protections
- All recommend analyzing churn by cohort rather than relying on aggregate retention metrics
- All identify key-person risk in a 50-person company as requiring thorough assessment
Where models disagree
- One model focuses on technology risk: technical debt, scalability ceiling, and infrastructure costs at scale
- Another raises ethical and cultural integration risks that could cause post-acquisition talent flight
- A third argues that 60% growth with high concentration suggests the product works but the sales motion doesn't: a fixable problem that the market is overpricing as risk
The consensus answer
The synthesis categorizes risks into three tiers: deal-breakers (customer concentration without contractual protections), material risks requiring price adjustment (technical debt, key-person dependency), and manageable risks (sales motion, cultural integration). It recommends specific due diligence steps for each tier.
Which preset to use
Solo
Duel
Council
Deep
Deep: up to four flagship models (GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.7). Use it when a wrong answer is expensive. You can also pick 1 to 4 models yourself from 20 across GPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok.
See it in 30 seconds
Frequently asked questions
Can Synero replace professional due diligence?
No. Synero is an analytical tool that helps identify risks and generate investigation frameworks. It should complement, not replace, professional legal, financial, and technical due diligence conducted by qualified advisors.
What types of due diligence does Synero help with?
M&A due diligence, vendor assessment, partnership evaluation, investment due diligence, and technology assessment. Synero is most valuable early in the process for identifying what to investigate, and later for stress-testing findings.
How does asking several models help with due diligence?
Models weigh a deal differently. One may focus on financial and structural analysis, another on cultural and long-term implications, another on cross-industry patterns, and another may argue against the deal to surface hidden risks. The differences list shows each model's stance.
Surface the risks you haven't considered
Up to four AI models running due diligence side by side. One complete risk assessment.
Start free3 free questions, no card. Then $10/month with $10 of usage included, or pay as you go with credit packs from $5, no subscription. Private by default, never used for training. See pricing